Twenty statements, four for each of the five ways a mind loops: replaying what happened, forecasting what might, reading what other people think, spiralling on a choice, and sifting what is worth keeping. You rate every statement on a five-point scale, and the four answers behind each loop are added into a score from 0 to 100. Your highest score is the loop you are leading with. Your loop load averages two things: how strongly the four looping patterns fired, and how little the sifting pattern did — which is why it can read mid when your two halves disagree with each other. The loop load is banded into four levels — Quiet, Settling, Persistent, Loud. If your top two land within one answer of each other, the page says so, because most people run two of these at once. The five loops are UMBRA's own way of describing overthinking — every statement, and the scoring behind it, was written by us, and no clinical instrument or third-party questionnaire was used. Replaying, forecasting, reading people and spiralling are all ordinary things a mind does; a high or low score here is not a diagnosis of anything, and a page cannot tell you what your own thinking means.